Evidence establishes that petitioner was conducting the video cassette shop and police seized MO. I find no reason to disbelieve the evidence of PW8 that he had rented out the building to the petitioner orally or that petitioner is running a video shop in the building, for the last five years prior to the date of his examination. Revision is filed challenging the order of remand. Though Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner vehemently argued that there is no evidence to prove that petitioner was in possession of MO. Though the independent witness, who is an attesting witness to Ext. True, apart from the oral evidence of PW8, no rent deed or rent receipt was produced. They are not applicable in cases where the question is whether the video cassettes contain obscene matters or not.
© 2020 theirishewe.com - All rights reserved. All Models are over 21 y.o.